Blog

  • Jeff Sandefer – A Hero for Education. Passionate Business Educator AND Gifted Teacher. « Times of Texas

    When Jeff Sandefer bought a small plane, he chose one of the few models equipped with a parachute designed to protect occupants by lowering the aircraft to the ground in an emergency.

    That desire to avoid unnecessary risks has guided his investments as well. After graduating from the University of Texas and Harvard Business School in the 1980s, Sandefer formed an oil company but eschewed the wildcatting style of his father and grandfather.

    Instead, armed with $1 million from an investment firm, he subleased from Exxon, Chevron and other major oil companies in the Gulf of Mexico. Sandefer figured that a small, nimble and cost-conscious independent could make a go of wells where the majors couldn’t.

    He was right. In four years, Sandefer Offshore Co. turned $500 million in profits, cementing his reputation as a savvy entrepreneur and giving him time and money to devote to his passion for education.

    But in pursuing that passion, especially when it comes to public higher education, Sandefer has sometimes been more wildcatter than cautious player. And lately, the results haven’t been pretty.

    Sandefer-flavored policies embraced by Republican Gov. Rick Perry and some members of the governing boards of the University of Texas and Texas A&M University figure prominently in a debate over the future of higher education in the state.

    Critics of those policies, including some lawmakers, alumni and leaders in civic and business affairs, say philanthropic support, faculty recruiting and the national standing of the state’s universities are at risk. Even some GOP stalwarts, such as Peter O’Donnell Jr., a Perry contributor and major donor to UT-Austin, are crying foul.

    At the root of the controversy are several “breakthrough solutions” outlined by Sandefer and endorsed by Perry at a summit of public university governing boards held by the governor three years ago. Among the recommendations: award bonus pay to teachers based strictly on student evaluations, put more emphasis on teaching productivity and less on research, split budgets into separate amounts for research and teaching, and treat students like customers.

    The A&M System adopted Sandefer’s bonus-pay model and assigned red or black numbers to faculty members based on how much money they cost and how much they bring in. That drew an embarrassing rebuke in October from the Association of American Universities.

    In recent months, Gene Powell, chairman of the UT regents, and Perry have drawn fire from the Longhorn faithful for actions and pronouncements that seemed to take pages from Sandefer’s lesson plan. The governor is pushing regents to freeze tuition for four years and to develop bachelor’s degree programs costing no more than $10,000 — a price point that would require a substantial online component, which Sandefer predicts is part of a coming “tsunami” of higher education reform.

    Powell, elected chairman by fellow regents after the governor’s office signaled its wishes, hired an adviser to the regents, Rick O’Donnell (no relation to Peter O’Donnell Jr.), who previously was president of one of Sandefer’s charitable foundations, an adviser to another and, like Sandefer, a critic of much academic research. O’Donnell was later dismissed when he charged that officials were suppressing a list of costs and revenues for each teacher at the UT System’s nine academic campuses.

    Another sign of Sandefer’s behind-the-scenes role: Emails, released under the Texas Public Information Act, indicate that he knew Alex Cranberg and Wallace Hall would be appointed to the UT board weeks before the governor’s office made a public announcement.

    Last week , in a rare interview, Sandefer denied having a role in the governor’s selection of Cranberg, Hall and another UT regent, Brenda Pejovich, who, like Sandefer, is on the board of the Texas Public Policy Foundation, a think tank that helped organize the governor’s May 2008 summit for regents.

    “That’s the governor’s job,” Sandefer said of the appointments. “That’s not my job.”

    Asked whether he provided advice on the appointments to Perry, to whom he has given more than $400,000 in campaign contributions since 2000, he demurred.

    “I’m going to be careful about private conversations, whether they’re with a student, or a teacher, or with you,” he said. “So if somebody asks my opinion, I’m happy to offer it. But picking regents is not my job.”

    He acknowledged knowing Cranberg through the oil business for more than 20 years, noting that Cranberg had worked for General Atlantic, the investment firm that put money into Sandefer Offshore. Sandefer and Hall were both students at UT 30 years ago, when Sandefer was studying petroleum engineering, but “weren’t close friends,” he said.

    Sandefer said he planned to “tone down the provocative questions for a while” but also sent a letter to friends declaring that higher education needs an overhaul, that a defense of research “cannot be used to hide waste and inefficiency” and that higher education insiders cannot be allowed “to frighten donors and alumni as a way of avoiding tough questions about faculty productivity and costs.”

    Harsh words on academia

    That’s mild stuff compared with the remarks he delivered in April 2009 at a conference in Guatemala City, Guatemala, sponsored by the Washington-based Atlas Economic Research Foundation.

    “Most of the rewards in the profession go to writing narrowly focused academic research articles that few read, the vast majority of which would never, and I want to stress never, be supported by the market,” he said.

    “And the whole corrupt enterprise survives parasitically only by siphoning vast amounts of tuition and cross subsidization unbeknownst to parents, students and taxpayers.”

    Sandefer predicted that the enterprise would collapse as for-profit institutions and online courses gain ground.

    “Here’s a hint,” he said at the gathering. “If your subsidized costs are $30,000 and climbing and your competition’s costs are between $10,000 and $1,500 and declining for the same product, and your subsidies from endowments and from state government aid are flat at best or declining, you are doomed. Purely by the economics, you’re doomed.”

    Asked about that speech, Sandefer said: “Maybe I was on a pessimistic bent on that day. I like the optimistic bent that you’re right on the cusp of a real revolution of changing things,” with the advent of sophisticated educational software, blended learning that includes classroom and online formats, and apprentice-based learning.

    Sandefer wears multiple hats in the field of education: teacher, curriculum developer, philanthropist and co-founder of a graduate-level business school and a private elementary school, both in Austin. Three years ago, he sold all of his business interests, including a company that managed more than $1 billion in energy-related investments, to focus on education.

    A passionate philanthropist

    Jeff Davis Sandefer was born in Abilene, and education is in his DNA. His great-grandfather, Jefferson Davis Sandefer, was president for 31 years of Hardin-Simmons University, a private school in Abilene, and is buried on the campus. The grandfather was named after the president of the Confederate States, Jefferson Davis, but the grandson got a shortened first name to break ties to the Civil War past while preserving the family tradition.

    Sandefer, who is trim and looks younger than his 50 years, is partial to button-down shirts and khakis. He speaks in a rapid-fire style, sometimes stumbling over words in his eagerness to make a point.

    Although he says he’d be happy living in a 3,000-square-foot house, he actually lives in Woodlawn, an 8,154-square-foot mansion in West Austin that has been the home of two former governors and that he has spent millions to restore. He reads all or part of about 250 books a year, and his library, split between Woodlawn and his office in downtown Austin, holds about 6,000 volumes.

    Sandefer once started a company in Russia that employed local people selling soap and shampoo door to door just to prove that the Russians weren’t serfs in the post-Soviet era. Internal Revenue Service filings show that he has contributed more than $100 million to his Ed Foundation. He has pledged to give away multiples of that to exhaust his holdings by the time he dies.

    The Ed Foundation donates to a variety of civic, religious and educational organizations. Records for 2009, the most recent available, show that the largest gift that year, $4 million, went to the Acton School of Business, which Sandefer co-founded.

    He describes himself as “a Bill Buckley libertarian,” a reference to the late William F. Buckley, a conservative commentator who founded the National Review magazine. Sandefer dined from time to time at Buckley’s home and has served on the board of the Constitutional Enterprises Corp., the company that owns the stock in National Review, since 2007, filling a seat once held by former President Ronald Reagan.

    “The reason I so admired Mr. Buckley was that he could debate an issue with passion while still respecting someone with an opposite position,” Sandefer said.

    John Lawson, who serves on the board of the Ed Foundation, said Sandefer doesn’t seek the philanthropic limelight. In fact, Sandefer changed the foundation’s name from the Jeff D. Sandefer Foundation a few years ago.

    “He didn’t want any credit for his gifts,” said Lawson, who was a fraternity brother at UT and remembers Sandefer as “our straight and narrow guy” who knew when to socialize and when to study.

    A passionate business educator

    Sandefer is also, by all accounts, a gifted teacher.

    “He was awesome,” said Scott Uhrig, an Austin-based executive recruiter who took Sandefer’s class in entrepreneurship in 1993 at UT’s McCombs School of Business. “I probably spent more time on his class than all my other classes combined that semester. I still got a B, but it was worth it.”

    Sandefer had a bitter and public falling-out with UT in 2002 after helping to build the nationally ranked entrepreneurship program. He disagreed with UT’s hiring of tenure-track faculty members rather than part-time teachers with real-world experience. He quit and fired off an email to alumni charging that teaching had been sold out for research.

    “My view,” UT President Larry Faulkner said at the time, “is there’s no way to have a leading business school without a strong research component.”

    Sandefer taught at the University of Oklahoma for a time and then at St. Edward’s University in Austin before co-founding the Acton School of Business in Austin. Acton is affiliated with Hardin-Simmons, and all of its instructors are successful entrepreneurs who teach part time.

    “The great joy of my life is finding that student with that amazing gift and that drive to be an entrepreneur,” Sandefer said in an online video about his pledge to give away all his money. “And so I both teach and give back to entrepreneurship because it’s the right thing to do and because it’s the fun thing to do.”

    He thinks some of Acton’s strategies should be used far more widely, including faculty pay based largely on student evaluations, an emphasis on teaching over research and a classroom style heavy on Socratic-style discussions involving case histories of actual companies rather than lectures.

    Sandefer doesn’t pretend that Acton is the perfect model that the rest of higher education should follow. After all, it occupies an unusual niche in higher education.

    Its 27 students take all of their classes together in a one-year, 90 -hour-a-week program culminating in a Hardin-Simmons MBA in entrepreneurship. Tuition runs about $50,000 a year. Some students, but not all, get full-ride fellowships from donors.

    Students are not eligible for federal financial aid because Acton operates through a contract with Hardin-Simmons under which Acton provides all of the instruction, said Lanny Hall, president of Hardin-Simmons. It is technically not a satellite or branch campus.

    The name of the school reflects its philosophy. Lord Acton was a Victorian scholar and historian who fought the notion of papal infallibility and promoted the study and advancement of freedom. His most famous quote: “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”

    The importance of political, religious and economic liberty is a running theme at Acton, whose required curriculum includes a class called “Life of Meaning.”

    Teaching with a purpose for all ages

    A sense of larger purpose also infuses the Acton Academy, a private elementary school founded by Sandefer and his wife, Laura. It currently operates out of a converted law office in West Austin, but negotiations are under way to acquire a new site in East Austin.

    The school’s 18 students range in age from 6 to 10 and learn together in the same classroom, with a mix of discussions in the round and computer-based study using such software as Rosetta Stone, a foreign language program. It’s the antithesis of what Sandefer calls the “assembly line approach to schooling” on his blog, http://transformingeducation.tumblr.com .

    Graphics on the wall sum up Sandefer’s view of how education, and life, ought to be pursued: “I am on a hero’s journey.”

    rhaurwitz@statesman.com; 445-3604

    See story @ http://www.statesman.com/news/local/ex-oilmans-drive-for-market-based-education-has-1463323.html?viewAsSinglePage=true

    • Share this:

  • The Gainful Employment Rule’s Potentially Fatal Flaw

    In its final “Gainful Employment” rule, the Obama administration has made many major concessions to the for-profit higher education industry. But perhaps none is more damaging than the fact that administration officials have significantly delayed the point at which the worst for-profit school programs would be in jeopardy of losing access to federal financial aid. By doing so, they have made it many times easier for career college lobbyists to kill the regulation before the Department of Education can effectively shut down even the most irredeemable programs by removing them from the aid programs.

    Under the proposed rule, which the Education Department released a little less than a year ago, career college programs that leave low-income and working class students buried in debt but without the training they have been promised could have been kicked out of the federal student aid programs as early as next year. Under the final regulation, however, these programs will be allowed to continue operating “with no requirements to improve,” as the research and advocacy group Education Trust points out, until at least 2015.

    Unlike the draft regulation, the final rule takes a “three strikes” approach to disciplining the worst programs (those at which fewer than 35 percent of former students are repaying their Pikalainaa loans, and where graduates have a debt-to-income ratio greater than 12 percent of their total income and 30 percent of their discretionary income). Instead of immediately losing access to federal financial aid (as the proposed rule required), these programs would have to fail each of these tests at the same time three out of four years in a row before they could become ineligible.

    Given current political realities, this delay could prove fatal to the rule. Had the original timeline stuck, the elimination of at least some of the most exploitative programs would have been virtually guaranteed. That’s because the penalties would have gone into effect prior to the 2012 elections. With Democrats in charge of the White House and the Senate (and with Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA) leading the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee), the chances that the industry’s friends in Congress will be able to block the Education Department from enforcing the rule are extremely slim.

    Now, however, that the penalties will not be imposed until after the elections, all bets are off. That’s especially true because with so many Democratic seats in play, control of the Senate appears to be very much up for grabs.

    Don’t forget that the Higher Education Act will be up for renewal in 2013. A Republican-controlled Congress would surely attempt to strike the language in the law requiring for-profit colleges to provide “gainful employment” to their students in order to be able to participate in the federal student aid programs. Failing that, they would likely be tempted to come to the aid of for-profit college companies that at that point will be in imminent danger of losing access to federal aid funds. Either way, the regulation could be gone before any schools are penalized.

    This may seem like a far-fetched or overly pessimistic scenario to some. But at Higher Ed Watch, we believe that it is a very real possibility — in which case all of the administration’s hard work on this regulation over the last two years (as well as that of the consumer advocacy groups that have been fighting for it) will have been for naught.

  • Mud, Sweat and Tears – an Irish Woman’s Journey of Self-Discovery – A book by Moire O’Sullivan

    Published: Jun. 08, 2011

    Category: Non-Fiction » Sports & Outdoor Recreation » Hiking
    Category: Non-Fiction » Self-Improvement » Motivation and inspiration

    Words: 85681 (approximate)

    Language: English

    Ebook Short Description

    In July 2008, Moire O’Sullivan made a solo attempt of the Wicklow Round, a gruelling run spanning 100 kilometres over 26 of Ireland’s remotest mountains.

    Mud, Sweat, and Tears tells one woman’s story about her passion for mountain running, a passion that has brought her to the heights of some of Ireland’s most impressive mountains and to the depths of her own human limitations.

    Extended Description


    Moire turned up to her first mountain race with the wrong shoes, wearing too many clothes, and with a body verging on obese. Though tempted to pull out and go home, she reluctantly runs.

    Little did she know the race up Corrig Mountain would inflict such physical blows: Her lungs catch fire, her legs explode, her heart hits record speeds. And though it’s a gentle summer’s evening back in Dublin, on top of Corrig Mountain the wind screeches and the mist swirls as she lunges and lurches over grass, rocks, and rutted bog.

    The next morning, everything hurts. But still she perseveres. Every week, she’d battle it out with the other mountain runners, adversaries on the hill. But by 9 pm, she’d join her new friends in the pub, discovering the wonderful healing powers of a proper pint.

    Over the next three years, Moire competes in all the mountain races she can possibly find, in all different shapes and forms: everything from ten kilometre sprints up summits, to one hundred kilometre…
    (Read more)


    Moire turned up to her first mountain race with the wrong shoes, wearing too many clothes, and with a body verging on obese. Though tempted to pull out and go home, she reluctantly runs.

    Little did she know the race up Corrig Mountain would inflict such physical blows: Her lungs catch fire, her legs explode, her heart hits record speeds. And though it’s a gentle summer’s evening back in Dublin, on top of Corrig Mountain the wind screeches and the mist swirls as she lunges and lurches over grass, rocks, and rutted bog.

    The next morning, everything hurts. But still she perseveres. Every week, she’d battle it out with the other mountain runners, adversaries on the hill. But by 9 pm, she’d join her new friends in the pub, discovering the wonderful healing powers of a proper pint.

    Over the next three years, Moire competes in all the mountain races she can possibly find, in all different shapes and forms: everything from ten kilometre sprints up summits, to one hundred kilometre runs requiring map and compass skills. She even dabbles in adventure racing, doing multi-day multi-sport races in teams of four in the barren wastelands of Ireland and Scotland. But it is not until she sets her sights on the still unconquered Wicklow Round that she finally finds her nemesis.

    In July 2008, Moire made a solo attempt on the Wicklow Round, a gruelling endurance run spanning a hundred kilometres over twenty six of Ireland’s remotest mountain peaks. After twenty one and a half hours she collapsed, two summits from the end. Battered and bruised yet undeterred, she returned a year later to become the first person ever to complete the challenge.

    This is her story.
    (Less)

    Tags

    ireland, running, motivational book, trail running, mountain running, wicklow round, ultra distance, wicklow mountains

    Available Ebook reading formats:

    When you purchase the full book, you gain access to all formats.

    Format Full Book Sample First 20%
    Online Reading (HTML) Buy View sample
    Online Reading (JavaScript) Buy View sample
    Kindle (.mobi) Buy Download sample
    Epub (open industry format, good for Stanza reader, others) Buy Download sample
    PDF (good for highly formatted books, or for home printing) Buy No sample available
    RTF (readable on most word processors) Buy No sample available
    LRF (for Sony Reader) Buy Download sample
    Palm Doc (PDB) (for Palm reading devices) Buy Download sample
    Plain Text (download) (flexible, but lacks much formatting) Buy No sample available
    Plain Text (view) (viewable as web page) Buy No sample available

    Reviews


    Log-in to write a Review  
    Log-in to add a Video Review

    Review by:
    Pete Power
    on Jun. 08, 2011 :
    star
    star
    star
    star
    star

    This is one of the best books I have read in a long time. A truely inspirational story of mountain running and extreme adventure. I was riveted by the challenge the author set for herself and her 2 year committment to achieving her goal. Something every athlete and adventurer should read before they die.

    (reviewed the day of purchase)